126
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
126 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
10637 readers
628 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I feel like mods should be protected like 'right to repair'. I know that seems a bit extreme but seriously, these people devote their time to create insane content, more often than not for free. I played Oblivion for hundreds of hours just because there were sooooo many mods for it. ARK is another example.
There's a way to do that: it's called "build your mod on top of a FOSS game instead of proprietary shit."
But the problem isn't that the mod is based on BG3. It's a mod for Stardew Valley. It just uses characters from BG3.
Making the mod for a FOSS game instead wouldn't change anything. The only solution would be making a Tux-mod for Stardew Valley instead. And who tf wants to play that?
Idk I'd romance the fuck outta xenia in SV though.
Sure a tux mod might not do well, but people love their foxgirls.