1216

The difference between programmers and testers (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 79 points 2 days ago

The programmer's answer?

We don't support that use case.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 69 points 2 days ago

"Works for me and my sister."

[-] Speiser0@feddit.org 28 points 2 days ago

Then we'll ship you and your sister.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago

And that’s how docker was born!

[-] Speiser0@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

Either that or incest porn.

[-] Kualdir@feddit.nl 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Still logs the issue

Dev sets status to won't do

Wait 2 months

P1 production issue: Exactly what I logged 2 months ago just written out worse

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I was once on a team that would filter out staging-only bugs in bug triage meetings. The team would only ever fix a bug if it was found in production. It was exactly as foot-gun as it sounds.

[-] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Okay I think the term 'foot-gun' is supposed to evoke the image of someone loading a gun and pointing it at their own foot. I can't help trying to picture a gun thats operated by a foot. Like a mech suit with a robot leg that also fires massive tank shattering shells when you do a roundhouse kick as a human operator. Or a veteran prosthetic leg that's also a rifle when you kick it the right way.

The brain rot seeps just a little bit more every time I see the term 'foot-gun' please help.