834
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the good folks who told us “safe and effective.”

…weren't wrong, and we've got a global vaccinated population to prove it, so I'm not sure what your point is.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32316 readers
565 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS