26
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

If you scroll lower down, there's a table with the amounts from the different samples from different fires.

I think it's telling that the amounts in the Palisades fire are by far the highest. That fire had a huge number of structures burned, so the samples of suppressant scraped off of leaves and things is going to be mixed with smoke and ash particles from those burning structures. It doesn't make sense that the amount of heavy metals would vary wildly from one batch of suppressant to another, but it makes perfect sense that the amount in a field sample would vary depending on what's burning in the area.

[-] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Hey, thanks, I don't know how I missed that, I thought the article ended about halfway through.

Updated the comment to reflect this.

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
26 points (93.3% liked)

Hacker News

1160 readers
248 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS