19
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
19 points (95.2% liked)
United States | News & Politics
8206 readers
176 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
What!? Thats the only basis? I mean thats a complete joke of a reason.
I was just reading a comment on Mastodon that immigration judges are not actual judges but are employed by the Administration. Which means they can't even rule on the constitutionality of the information provided -- so they're really nothing but puppets to make the process appear to be legal.
So the next question is... can the ruling be appealed before a real judge?
That’s interesting. Link(s)?
This is the Mastodon link, but he is quoting a NYT article (from which I'll quote the meat)...
https://tech.lgbt/@joshuajfriedman.com@bsky.brid.gy/114321303656287669
Thanks! Kangaroo court.