Hey folks. I've had an on-again, off-again relationship with Linux for over 20 years. Usually, my attempts to use it are either thwarted by issues installing, issues booting, or general problems while using it... leading to “catastrophic failure” that I can't fix without digging into hours of research and terminal commands.
Windows 11 (even 10) are rock solid for me, even as a very heavy multitasker. No crashes. No needing to reboot, unless I'm forced to with an update, and really no issues with any hardware or software I was running.
But with Linux, I just can't believe how unstable it is, even when I do the absolute basic things.
I'm trying to learn why this is, and how I can prevent these issues from coming up. As I said, I'm committed to using Linux now (I'm done with American software), so I'm open to suggestions.
For context, I'm using a Framework laptop, which is fully (and officially) supports Fedora and Ubuntu. Since Fedora has American ties, I've settled with Ubuntu.
All things work as they should: fingerprint scanner, wifi, bluetooth, screen dimming, wake up from suspend, external drives, NAS shared folders, etc. I've even got VirtualBox running Windows 11 for the few paid software that I need to load up from time to time.
But I'm noticing issues that seemingly pop out of nowhere on the software/os end of things.
For example, after having no issues updating software, I get this an error: "something went wrong, but we're not sure what it is."
Then sometimes I'll be using Firefox, I'll open a new tab to type in a search term or URL, and the typing will "lag", then the address bar will flicker like it's reloading, and it doesn't respond well to my mouse clicks. I have to close it out, then start over for it to resolve.
Then I'll open a different app, sometimes it might open, sometimes it won't.
Or an app will freeze for no obvious reason, and I'll get a popup asking to wait or quit.
Another time I left my computer while I went out for a walk, came back, and it was like I just rebooted... all my work was gone, and it was starting fresh from the login screen.
I'm trying not to overload things, and I'm doing maybe 1/5th of what I'd normally be doing when running windows. But I don't understand why it's so unstable.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
FWIW, I'm not keen to switch away from Ubuntu, because I do still want official support if there's ever a problem with getting hardware to work.
UPDATE: Wow, I did not expect to get so many responses! Amazing!
Per suggestions, I ran a memtest86 for over 3 hours and it was clean.
I installed Fedora 41 and am now setting it up. Seems good so far, and elevated permissions can be authorized with biometrics! This was not something I had to. Ubuntu, so awesome there!
Any specific tips for Fedora that I should know? Obviously, no more Snap packages now! 😂
UPDATE 2: Ok, Fedora seems waaaay more stable than Ubuntu (and Mint). No strangeness like before... but not everything works as easily. For example, getting a bridged network adapter to work in virtualbox was one-click easy on Ubuntu... not so much on Fedora (still trying to get it working). And Virtualbox didn't even run my VM without more terminal hackery.
But the OS seems usable, and I'm still setting things up.
One thing I have noticed, however. When I search for how to fix or do something, nearly all websites and forums reference Debian/Ubuntu commands, so the fragmentation there is a little annoying
Security is not as huge of a problem on linux as it is on windows for sure. But EVERY SINGLE proprietary app you use can snoop on EVERYTHING. and I do not trust proprietary apps, beginners especially will use a ton of proprietary software. Remember that we're recommending to a beginner, not a linux evangelist who is willing to do anything to make linux/foss work for them.
If you use KDE on a laptop from like 2002 it will be a HORRIBLE experience, they use way too much ram, way too much rendering (with animations and whatnot), absolute cpu and gpu hogs for a machine from back then. that's pretty much the reason xfce and lxde exist. It'll also be real bad on cinnamon. Maybe this is better now, I haven't tried in a while.
The only reason I see for a beginner not to choose KDE over xfce is if they have a laptop from the 32 bit era. Elsewise, KDE if you use windows, Gnome if you use macos. The development speed alone and the fact that they have proper funding means in 20 years they'll probably still be around, cinnamon development is nearly dead by comparison, we shouldn't be encouraging people to use significantly less supported software unless there's a compelling reason, and for cinnamon, there really just isn't. People won't want to relearn everything when cinnamon breaks for them, might as well start on the most well supported stuff for all hardware.
I personally don't use KDE, but I don't think we should be recommending anything but KDE/Gnome to beginners without very good reason. Sure, use whatever you want, but that isn't a valid course of action for someone who doesn't even know where to start, and the obvious answer for where to start is KDE.
I think many people here have been linux users for so long that they forget their solution isn't the best choice for beginners.
i don't trust them either but from what i have seen most don't care
this is a bit of a stretch
the development rate is a deciding factor for sure and i agree that we shouldn't encourage using software that is considered "obsolete"
i don't agree on everything and maybe you're right i still don't get why they dropped support for kde but still support MATE
They get this benefit for free on KDE. Even if they don't care, it's still better for them.
I don't see how it's a stretch, someone was posting with basically this exact problem on one of the linux forums on lemmy like, last week. I don't feel like digging up the post but this happens sometimes.
Makes absolutely no sense for a beginner distro.