26
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
26 points (93.3% liked)
Movies & TV
23194 readers
172 users here now
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
-
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
-
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
-
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Are we arguing or is one or both of us misreading the other's intent? I'm already on board with you that many of the fandom's depictions of Derpy are genuinely great and affirming for people with disabilities, and that the edit of the episode erases a disabled character, and that it's better in any case to watch the original version of the episode. I was not particularly concerned with whatever role AKR vis-à-vis the editors and other staff had in making the scene as it aired, nor the purity or goodness of the intentions of any party involved in the production, nor how offensive the name Derpy is. My issues with the scene, for that matter, really hold up regardless of whether Derpy's disability is only intellectual or only physical or if we're being honest both at the same time.
I figured it might've been that, but it can be hard to read intent sometimes...