55
Astronomy Facts
(lemmy.ml)
Source: https://xkcd.com/3072/
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
55 points (98.2% liked)
Comic Strips
18511 readers
698 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Well, im not an astrologist, so I only know what I know from like.. middle school class trips, but there are stars being born all the time im pretty sure :3
Are they observable in our sky at a 100 years old? Probably not :3 space is massive so light takes a while to get here at that distance
It's all relative in space ๐ . But I could reformulate my question: are visible today in our night sky stars that weren't visible less than 100 years ago?
https://www.space.com/astronomers-new-star-nova-explosion-t-coronae-borealis
Not exactly the question, but while looking into it I found this :3 a star visible once every 80 years
In order for the stars to actually be less than 100 years old, they would also need to be with a hundred light years of us.