AI does not have the creative capacity to make art.

I agree!

And the same applies to cameras. That doesn't mean that photographs can't be art, though.

It’s not dada. It’s too coherent to be dada, and it’s too shit to be anything else.

TBH my first instinct was trolling, especially as it's easy to overlook when you're just reading the text, not focussing on anything else. Point is when you'd hang this thing in an exhibition the audience would go all "ahh" and examine the mechanism.

The academic art world is beset nowadays with blurbs of barely intelligible critical theory to justify themselves, I find a fresh amateur artists saying "oh that's interesting, neat, let's keep it" much more interesting.