834
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago

No matter what they say, i'll assume aspartamine is poison and refuse to eat anything that has it.

[-] Policeshootout@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I think the same thing about everything! Never believe anything that doesn't align with my personal beliefs no matter how much evidence exists to the contrary!

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I just dont want to risk it, because i'll be the only one who faces the consequences if it causes cancer after all. It also tastes awful anyway, i'd rather drink completely unsweetened drinks.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32353 readers
597 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS