than what Mr. Carney proposes without going all the way to “reject markets entirely.”

I think there's a vast gulf between absolutely unregulated 'free' markets of the typical cruel blue, and 'reject markets entirely'. Just because the Cons typically play in the farthest anti-people range of the spectrum doesn't mean everything that places any value on society over those markets is immediately rejecting markets entirely. There's a lot of room for a gov to do anything beneficial to its people, and thus appear to be way more social than the cons' typical position, and still not be anti-capitalist.