1185
submitted 2 months ago by mesamunefire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

I wonder if the cybertruck will be the Delorian of the future.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 42 points 2 months ago

Well no, it won't because people actually like the Delorian due to it being redeemed by one of the greatest time travel movies ever made.

[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 10 points 2 months ago

We can make it happen with the Cyber truck!

BACK TO THE FÜHRER starring Kid Rock as Marty and Musk as the Doc and the truck doesn't make it.

[-] pacology@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Here me out. What if they remaster back to the future and the plutonium guys at the beginning drive a cybertruck instead of the white truck?

[-] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Mostly because it had a garbage engine. The one they used in the movies was modified with a much better engine.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

The fact that the real Delorean couldn't do 88 miles per hour was part of the joke.

[-] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

Ah okay.

I have no idea about cars or engines

Yeah, the reason why they chose 55 mph in the movie is that was the max speed of the car (if i remember right)

Also the way the doors opened were pretty inconvenient

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

It was 88 mph, which is a speed that the original engine for the DeLorean was not capable of.

[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

The flux capacitor is activated when it reaches 88mph. They had to add a digital speedometer because the Delorian's only went to 85.

[-] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That was typical of cars made (for US market) in the early to mid 80s... Can't remember for sure if it was part of the whole national 55mph speed limit, but I'd bet it was.

[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

it wasn't a good car, It just looked unique.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The suspension had to be raised to meet new pedestrian safety standards. This ruined the handling.

They couldn't get the engine they really wanted (a Mazda rotary) and had to go with a GM piston engine instead. Then, new US emissions standards hit and it had to be downrated to meet those. EU models were better, though engine design in general was kinda in the shitter around this time.

People think it's heavy because of the stainless steel, but those are thin panels over fiberglass. Its weight is in the same ballpark as what Ferrari was putting out at the time.

The first alternator they used did not have enough power for all the accessories to be on at once. People got stranded at night because of this, including Johnny Carson (who was an early investor). These were upgraded later.

Then there's some manufacturing difficulties. The early models have creases embedded on each side of the hood. Forming the stainless steel that way often broke it at the factory. Later models have a completely flat hood.

As the company's finances dwindled, DeLorean himself was caught in an FBI sting operation where he was accused of selling drugs to try to keep the company afloat. This ended up being a setup by the FBI--with Larry Flynt coming to the rescue, of all people--but it plunged the company's reputation even more.

It was a shitty time to make a sports car. Lots of stuff happening at once that made them bad at what they are. Make it 5 years earlier or 5 years later and it's an entirely different story. Even that might be generous; 1980s sports cars are known more for their angular looks than actual driving ability. It wouldn't be until the 1990s that companies started to figure out how to work within the new regulations. Then you get legendary bangers again like the Supra MkIV.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It wasn’t hated. It just wasn’t a good car.

[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You misspelled Mandalorian

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Looper, right? /s

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Probably not, the Delorean was pretty cool even when it was new, I believe.

Also, a Cybertruck is massively complex, so keeping an old one running would be difficult.

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 8 points 2 months ago

Pretty sure there's probably a Killswitch built in so that it won't run past a certain date without giving Tesla more money, so once the company tanks they'll all be dead in the water.

[-] Trollception@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Like an iconic vehicle they make movies about?

[-] nomy@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 months ago

A colossal failure that's only remembered as a joke.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 2 months ago

The DeLorean was 95% of the way to a brilliant car. The last 5% killed it with a combination of bad market timing and a few questionable parts selections. Most of those issues had been worked out after the first 3000 units, but the company's reputation was in the shitter by then.

The FBI sting was a complete hoax.

There is no saving the Cybertruck. It's poorly built, ugly, and comes from a company run by a narcissist.

[-] Trollception@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Yes, let the hate flow through you, young Padawan.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Well, it is iconic and will be used as a metaphor years from now when people start making movies of this era.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

They won't find a single one to film.

On the global scale the Cybertruck is an incredibly niche American thing.

It's only ever sold 40 something thousand units since 2023. That's ridiculously low.

For comparison, Toyota sells some 11 million vehicles a year globally. And just in the United States, Porsche yearly sells some 70k units. That 40k Cybertrucks is from three fiscal years

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah but it is famous loke the pinto, anf easy to recognize loke the delorean, and easy to make a prop version of.

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Like. I and o are next to each other on the keyboard

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Sure slapping a few pizza boxes together and painting it silver would make a convincing enough replica, but why would anyone bother?

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

No no. Why would anyone bother to put one in their movies in 20 years?

That's like saying they'd have people wearing Apple Vision Pro's in 20 years. Why? Wasn't a big product. Just an overhyped one which utterly failed.

Perhaps as a meme to how shit it is but it's definitely not "iconic to the era".

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it is. Just not in the way elmo wanted.

[-] drhodl@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

More probably the Edsel or Yugo, but with the quality of a Lada.

[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

Well, the production of the cybertruck certianly smashed the delorean.

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
1185 points (99.6% liked)

News

30032 readers
1064 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS