273
I'm new and missed the lore
(lemmy.ca)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
273 points (88.5% liked)
memes
14419 readers
2394 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lemmy.ml, hexbear, and lemmygrad users verbally fellate contemporary and historical autocratic mass-murderers they deem to be “leftists”, or "great leaders and allies to the cause", most recently being Vladimir Putin, Xi Jingping, and Kim Jong Un.
They are, in reality, bitch-made invertebrates who don’t even have the arm-strength to lift their Molotov-sippy-cups out of their premium-outdoor-brand backpacks, let alone form meaningful opinions on economics, political philosophy, or geopolitical reality.
More of this weird mythological fearmongering. Absolutely nobody on any of those sites believe that Vladimir fucking Putin is a leftist. You are pulling this assertion straight from an uninformed ass.
"If you don't support Russia, you don't understand international geopolitics " ~dessalines
Ffs. Yes, supporting Russia's invasion is a step too far. However, there is a valid point to be made regarding the West's geopolitical maneuvers leading up to the invasion. NATO expanding east after promising not an inch further, supporting regime change in Ukraine, crossing more of Russia's "red lines," etc. Again, I want to stress that the invasion is morally reprehensible, but it's clear why they did it from a geopolitical standpoint.
Nobody is talking about why Russia did what they did and realistically there's nothing majorly wrong with NATO, it's an alliance of mostly EU countries to band together to prevent another world war and to protect themselves from "another Germany" and Russia has done absolutely nothing over the past 20+ years to assure people that they won't attack NATO EU countries. Quite the opposite in fact.
In any case, I have them parroting Russia narratives/misinformation here: https://lemmy.world/post/27314050 here: https://lemmy.world/post/27012640 and here https://lemmy.world/post/27288224 shows censoring of people even merely express that EU is also right to be concerned of Chinese and Russian militaries on their front lawn
I agree there's nothing inherently wrong with NATO, but I think you have some of the NATO basics wrong. NATO was very much an anti-Soviet and then anti-Russian alliance. There wouldn't be a NATO if there wasn't a Soviet Union, that's not up for debate. Russia wanted to join NATO at one point, ffs. Russia has done a lot fairly recently to show they won't attack NATO countries. For example, they attacked Georgia and then Ukraine to prevent them from joining NATO. Clearly they're afraid of NATO and don't want to fight it.
Right, because they were considered the biggest threat, if any country was going to go "Germany" it would be Russia/USSR.
That doesn't prove anything, Russia excels at Intelligence programs, so if anything there were ulterior motives. "Russia. Crap military, fantastic intelligence agency" ~Some comment I saw here once.
Are you serious? Attacking sovereign countries to show other sovereign countries in an alliance that you won't attack them?
Yea no, he doesn't want to attack NATO yet, he wants to slow down its growth because he wants Russias military growth to outpace it first. Then when he feels good and ready then will be the attack.
Unlike Drump, Putler isn't stupid, he has a plan and he's executing it. And a big thing about plans, you generally want to take certain actions at certain times
Okay great, we agree on the first quote. Why'd you use Germany as an example instead of Russia?
Second point. You think Russia is super sneaky or something? If they were, then how'd they lose Ukraine and had to invade? They're clearly lacking when compared to the West.
Third point, yeah, I'm serious. Russia won't attack NATO. They clearly don't want to fight NATO, hence preventing countries within their sphere of influence from joining NATO. Russia would get wrecked even if they somehow won. It's not worth it and if NATO was somehow weak enough that Russia could win, then they wouldn't need to fight. They could coerce/incentivize without invading.
You're very misinformed or just intentionally misrepresenting history here. If you think Russia was ever going to join nato in good faith even if allowed, you're a silly child.
My dear downvoted friend! I think this perfectly answers @Vegeta@lemmy.ca question. If you have any viewpoint outside what is "political correct" you get downvoted, even just saying what the NATO Secretary General Jens "Warmonger" Stoltenberg gloated himself:
So what are socialists to do? They can't help it! And the only thing liberals hate more than fascists are socialists, especially the dirtbag left when they get a little snippy.
I have seen evidence to the contrary.
Those wannabe champions of labor are temporarily-inconvenienced-dictators-in-waiting.
where the fuck are you finding it? i hang out in these instances often and will rarely see it.
!meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works
Oh wait you're on .ml and the admins have censored it from you so you'll have to use this link: https://lemmy.world/c/meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works
Then link it. You’re full of shit.
This guy did a lot of the work for me.
So if I gather my own posts as a citation for my own claims that's valid too?
Did you actually read through their links? Because if you did, I don’t think you’d be this confident.
I have. I stand by everything I've written in this post.
Well, I read through them, and they are definitely not making the point that y’all are trying to make. I assume you’re counting on other people not going through them.
Exactly what Rusty wants. I clicked, I checked, saw bad/faulty evidence along the lines of those people who claim "the left wants to remove X" with a tweet with 4 likes.
I can ignore any claims they want now, since I know they don't want people to read beyond headlines.
I suspect rusty may be a cm0002 alt or colleague. When one starts to drown in comment pushback, the other usually shows up.
Either way, both can be ignored for the same reasons.
Makes sense honestly with how much they love each other and treat each other as gospel. And they claim Russians bots are a thing.
I'll probably block him like I blocked cm0002 for being an insufferable troll.
👍🏽
The bad part is that they support him, whether or not they consider him a real leftist is less important