292
The wonderful world of Linux package managers
(thelibre.news)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
292 points (98.3% liked)
Linux
54171 readers
562 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
That's so true, I was missing this part! With homebrew you're at the mercy of whoever put the package out there, much like with installers (and nix to be fair)
LMAO no‽ Flatpaks can be verified, and you can choose not to install unverified flatpaks (which you should!) They are also containerised pretty well by default, in case they're malicious!
Flatpaks can be verified. Compare that to apt packaged, which must be cryptographically signed.
That's why flatpak isnt secure. If you use it, you might end up running malicious code. Because, unlike most Linux repo package managers, it doesn't require packages to be cryptographically verified as authentic.
I get that it's less secure, but using verified flatpaks beats homebrew by a large margin.
Using apt, yum, dnf, pacman etc beats flatpak by magnitudes
True, but saying Brew is unsafe but Flatpak isn't, isn't too odd, either.