1144
submitted 2 months ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/memes@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 91 points 2 months ago

I somewhat dislike using stats like this. Like sure climate change isn't a problem solvable by individual actions such as those but those companies aren't just evil nonsense either. You look them up and a lot of them are mega companies that produce much of the things people use daily so climate change isn't solvable without restructuring our world order and relationship to consumption and nature. Just people sometimes seem to use this stat as a talking point on how daily life and current world order doesn't need to be changed drastically just get rid of these handful of mega polluters and emitters when its not that simple.

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 37 points 2 months ago

They would not sell (nor profit) something that people refuse to buy.

We are the ones doing this.

[-] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 months ago

They would not sell (nor profit) something that people refuse to buy.

So they are wasting money on hiring advertising and marketing companies?

Then there's also planned obsolescence and licensing deals that make it impossible to continue using and repairing things (even mechanical things like tractors, and living organisms like crop seeds).

Sure, people can try their best, but there is only so far we can go before it gets so inconvenient to not fall into the consumerism trap.

[-] technohippie@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Their marketing strategy isn't just blaming the consumer, it is to sell that their product is "sustainable and green", and people instead of not buying, they buy their "sustainable and green" product that shouldn't even exist in the first place. So no, they are not wasting money on marketing, they just changed the strategy.

Coming back to people, have you tried convince someone to change their preferred message app even knowing that belongs to an evil company and making the change being a literal 5 minute task?

In my experience people aren't even trying. Just blaming the same way companies and politicians do. If we really tried our best many things would have changed already. I believe that everything we have now is just a mirror of our collective greed, and we are doomed if we expect the other (companies and politicians) to change anything.

[-] quack@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

Everyone wants change, no one wants to change. It’s a tale as old as time.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago

So they are wasting money on hiring advertising and marketing companies?

Perfect place to link the ol' Bill Hicks take on marketing.

[-] postcapitalism@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago

Much easier to control and regulate the actions of 57 than 7billion - that’s the point

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

carbon footprint is a psyop by gas companies to make people feel like individuals are responsible for climate change not them

[-] nsrxn@scribe.disroot.org -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

they can't know what we will buy before they make it. they manufactur on speculation.

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
1144 points (97.2% liked)

solarpunk memes

4203 readers
736 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS