240
What were people doing before high fives??
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
240 points (98.4% liked)
Microblog Memes
7628 readers
1203 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It wouldn't. It would just switch the orientation of the camera. The preview/what you're looking at would remain in portrait mode.
It's literally a software problem. You don't use a different camera when you go into landscape mode, you're just using a different aspect ratio.
So again, why don't we have this?
But the camera sensor is a rectangle, right? So you could do it with software, but you would lose resolution because the sensor isn't as wide in that direction. You'd just be cropping the image.
I think you're right that it's related to it being a rectangle and without changing the sensor shape it'd be basically a crop in software.
The cameras are round though so it's only the capture hardware that would need to be fixed. The "megapixel" of the camera constantly increases as well so dropping some of it in a crop may not even matter much in the long run.
What @dave@lemmy.nz said.
Although we could just use a square matrix.
I'm assuming the reasons we don't use a square are cost and space. Phones are pretty tightly packed in, every 1mm width you add probably has flow on effects for other things you can't have.
And I am not sure what the limiting factor is but if you add a bunch more light sensors to make it square I'm assuming that comes with additional cost, not just the sensors but now you need to connect up a bunch more to whatever controls it which then might need more processing power or smaller connectors or some other flow on impact.
Oh yes, absolutely, to everything you've said. Every pixel on the matrix has to be wired up individually. My only argument would be that we've already reached ridiculous resolutions on phones - might as well plop a square sensor in.