573
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

Not sure if you believe that the earth is only a few thousand years old, or you're trying to say that all people that lived 150 years ago are dead by now, but humankind has been roaming this planet for more than two million years without refrigerators.

And quite successfully, if you consider that they conquered all continents without refrigerators, except the one where you really don't need a fridge.

[-] Tommelot@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago

We are not homo erectus though. So that's a rather silly comparison.

[-] trk@aussie.zone 2 points 8 hours ago

I'm pretty homo erectus 😎

[-] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I never said that you are homo erectus. That doesn't change the fact that homo erectus were humans. And even if you really stick to the believe that humankind only started with homo sapiens some 20000 years ago, it doesn't matter for the argument that people have survived a long time without being able to keep their food at a constant 4°C.

[-] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

FYI you accidentally dropped a zero, it's 200,000 years.

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

I am not the person you replied to but I believe they were referring to Homo sapiens being said to have emerged roughly 2-300k years ago, so 0.3 million, not "millions" (plural). Homo the genus might be a mil or two, but not the species, although you said "humankind" thus implying the species.

[-] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Maybe it's just lost in translation. In my native language we'd call homo erectus etc. (primal) humans, so for me they are part of the humankind although they're not modern humans.

[-] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

You are correct. The word "homo" literally means human.

Homo sapiens are the only living humans, but Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthalus are all humans also.

However we usually use the term "archaic human" or even change human to "hominid" to prevent confusion between "modern humans".

You weren't wrong, but this is a kind of jargon which can confuse people.

[-] bpev@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

I don't know what I expected when I started scrolling through comments, but I certainly didn't expect "how long humanity has survived depends on how you define 'people' "

[-] Nelots@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

except the one where you really don’t need a fridge

Clear evidence that Big Refrigerator is actually holding back our true potential!

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
573 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

6885 readers
2992 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS