576

Dont Ever Listen To Those Who Claim "Voting is Pointless" (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 day ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

You don't succeed the first time. That's why you adjust and try different methods.

No one cares enough to force change.

That's certainly not true as the canadians give the liberals a minority so they're forced to compromise with the smaller parties that's how we got universal heatlhcare.

[-] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You're missing my point. Under FPTP, small parties are rapidly shrinking and losing power. Outside the two party system, only 30 seats are held currently (down from 59), and this will continue to shrink.

The only directly political way this will change is if BQ and NDP form an alliance to force election reform through. How likely do you really think that is, given their lack of action in the past?

Indirectly, you need en-masse, organized voting for small parties and or a massive, enconomy threatening strike. Neither is going to happen unless things get MUCH worse.

[-] jszym@cosocial.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

@PlzGivHugs @Sunshine The distortions of FPTP greatly serve the Bloc, so it is doubtful they'd join in. E.g. in this election BQ and NDP received about 6% of the vote but got 22 and 7 seats, respectively.

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Eh the smaller parties didn't resonate with people so much this time around and we were closer to a 2-party state in the past. I mean we had the unionist party supplant the conservatives and liberals during ww1.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1917_Canadian_federal_election

Being negative is cheap and doesn't inspire anyone. That's what the powerful few want. I want to hear solutions not complaining.

[-] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 hours ago

Eh the smaller parties didn't resonate with people so much this time around and we were closer to a 2-party state in the past. I mean we had the unionist party supplant the conservatives and liberals during ww1.

I mean, a World War and the resulting turmoil probably would be enough to dislodge the conservatives today. Thats exactly the sort of "MUCH worse" I was talking about.

Being negative is cheap and doesn't inspire anyone. That's what the powerful few want. I want to hear solutions not complaining.

No, but neither does lying. Saying "Just support the small parties more" isn't a realistic fix in our current system, nor does any other, "sit at home and hope things improve strategy." Large scale organization is needed, and letting people think it'll get better with their inaction only helps the established parties too.

The only way it'll get better is if people get angry and force the government to listen - look at any rights movement ever. Lying to people won't get them off their asses. What might, is the realization that things will keep getting worse unless they actually step-up and start organizing.

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Of course you claim in bad faith that anyone who doesn't agree with you is "just sitting at home and not doing anything"

Stop it with the strawmans.

Your negativity isn't going work in getting people out at the streets protesting more. I'm not going to let 2 corporate political parties continue to whip their mps to "play along or else" go unchallenged as that would be way worse for the working class of this country in the long run.

We need to push for: