4
From the book "Stalin" the seminal work of Historian Domenico Losurdo
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13489 readers
770 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah have you ever lived in the USSR? Have you ever been to a post soviet country? Yeah...
Damn, countries suck AFTER the socialist system was abandoned and everything was looted by liberal vultures??????????????????
Reject causality, embrace liberal brainwashing
Yes I do wish I lived in the USSR at it's prime.
Also it's a bit rich to use the "muh post soviet poverty shit hole" line when it was the wests neoliberal economic shock doctrine that caused such a tragedy in the first place.
Yes because you have no idea... Which is fine, but then you should be less confident about your world views on isolated political systems full of self propaganda...
Oh the irony.
No one here is being propagandized. You do not get Marxist propaganda defending the USSR in the west. Almost all of us grew up with the very opposite. The majority of us have had to spend our own time reading and learning. Sorry mate, but you are the one steeped in propaganda and I'd love for you to prove otherwise
Have you driven a soviet made car?
Car brained lmao
Have you ever ridden an American-made train?
we had an 80s lada riva when i was a kid
it was fine
my mum preferred it to the austin montego we had next
Most of us have, obviously. Please, educate me on your experience with soviet cars.
Not that I give a shit. I don't know if you've noticed but cars haven't been a very intelligent mode of transportation for modern civilization, given the fact that they're wildly inefficient and the fuel they burn is literally destroying the worlds ecosystem. Guess there's trains though, right? Can't imagine the Soviets being much good at trains though. I wonder how the Chinese are doing with trains?
Yes that's true... I have no idea about the sheer trauma... Of having to share 1 communal toothbrush with the entire city... Or when Stalin took out his big spoon and ate literally 70% of everyone's cheerios in one bite... Truly horrible...
The USSR took a backwater state that was still stuck in feudalism (meaning fucking serfdom) and within a single human generation sent the first person into space. They started from a way worse state than the west and made incredible achievements. They did this without the help of first world powers, and were even hindered by constant economic warfare to boot.
Yeah, you can visit ex Soviet states and see the degradation. Most of their failing infrastructure was built under Soviet planning and has since gone to rot. Economic liberalization has brought nothing to the table, and has obviously failed utterly at whatever promises we're made initially.
None of what I'm saying is even debatable. The economic truths of the USSR are easily learned. YOU are a western chauvinist dipshit who looks at the achievements of actual socialism and without a single bit of historical material understanding spouts some ignorant bullshit. I'll be clear: save your breath to instead talk about whatever authoritarian atrocities were supposedly dealt out. When you talk about the economic failures of the USSR you are treading on ahistorical bullshit that has no real ground.
Yeah sure, with all the licensed and stolen western tech. Mother russia couldn't even mass produce a consumer automobile SOMEONE ELSE DESIGNED FOR THEM. This was the state of soviet manufacturing. Outdated western designs built in a that'll do fashion.
Literally regurgitating nazi garbage, no exaggeration. Good job.
Lib got scratched
Which Western company was Sputnik and Soyuz licensed from?
You said the standards of living in the USSR in 1950 was “incredibly low”, have you ever lived in former British and French colonies in Asia?
Many countries in Asia still haven’t yet achieved independence by 1950, and I can assure you that the standards of living in the USSR was already leaps and bounds beyond most of the world at the time, and comparable to post-war Western Europe and would have easily surpassed them if Western Europe never had the luxury of receiving the vast amount of financial aid from their American masters through the Marshall Plan.
Yes because this is how geopolitics work. The USSR basically entirely in Europe. The living standards should be comparable to what europe was like. And not what africa was like. Or Mars.
It was comparable to Western Europe even without the Marshall Plan, what are you talking about lol. This is 1950 we’re talking about, much of Europe was still in ruins thanks to Nazism.
Like honestly, I won't comment on any of this anymore. But where are you guys from? Because you are either Russian, and sucking the dicks of a failed dictator, or you are from several continents away, with no context to any of this, and then you just are a bunch of useful idiots to a failed dictator. Answer this one honestly. Either to me or to yourselves...
I hardly think the guy who beat the nazis and raised standards of living in the USSR from borderline starvation to comparable with western Europe in a couple decades a failure. There were regular famines before Stalin; after Stalin there were none until capitalism reversed all that progress, immiserated the populace, and decreased all measurements of human development by similar numbers to WWII.
The CIA admits he wasn't a dictator, merely representing the dictatorship of the proletariat.
I don't care what the CIA thinks of stalin. Like how is the fucking CIA an authority on europe in the 60-s. Also Stalin didn't beat the nazis. The british did.
the British very nearly got wiped off the map. what are you talking about. it was the Eastern front that saved Britain, by their own admission.
nazi germany and british empire taking each other out would've been the best possible outcome. Yeah I know anglo island was severely weakened by the war but still
The British?
Lol good bit
The BRITISH did lmao bro I can’t
man got owned so hard he dropped the mask, went straight for homophobia, then dropped the dorkiest line i've ever read on lemmy lmao
I don't think geographic location is as significant as a country's, you know, history. Just because they were in Europe doesn't mean that they were starting out on equal footing. If you compare the state of Russia under the tsar to somewhere like Britain or France, then it's clear that the Soviets were starting from a disadvantage. Moreover, they were under constant economic and military threats from most of the developed world. In spite of all of that, they were able to develop quickly enough to defeat the Nazis and become a global superpower.
If you look for it, you can find a video of children offering themselves up as prostitutes in post-Soviet collapse Russia. Please really stop and think about what would force someone to have to do that. When we think of some generic image of an Eastern Bloc, post-Soviet shithole, whatever your mental picture is wasn't created by that nation. You're thinking of a post-collapse nation. We have our own in America called the Rust Belt. We don't blame the existence of ford and general motors as causing the dilapidation of Detroit. Their departure and subsequent economic collapse destroyed that region. It's a similar story writ large all over the former Second World.
And sure, Soviet cars sucked. Fortunately most people didn't need them.