113
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by dragonfucker@lemmy.nz to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

On what grounds?

EDIT:

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)(1) allows a court to "strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." Use of this dragon cartoon logo is not only distracting, it is juvenile and impertinent. The Court is not a cartoon.

Lmao, I've never heard of any other watermarks warranting this extreme response. Does the judge just get to decide whatever he wants is impertinent or scandalous?

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 15 points 2 months ago

Yeah, “scandalous” is too much. I can see “impertinent”, though. I don’t agree, but courts are notoriously uptight.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

impertinent

I don't know if there's a specific legal meaning


legal jargon isn't always plain English


but it might be that the meaning there is the other English meaning of "impertinent":

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/impertinent

impertinent (comparative more impertinent, superlative most impertinent)

  1. Insolent, ill-mannered or disrespectful; Disregardful.

  2. (archaic) Not pertaining or related to (something or someone); Irrelevant or useless.

I mean, the term right before it in the code is "immaterial", which is very close to the second common-language definition. Just because it's archaic in common-language use doesn't mean that it is in the legal world


a lot of legal terms with jargon meanings were in common use at one point.

kagis

Yeah, sounds like it:

https://www.lsd.law/define/impertinent

Definition: Impertinent means something that is not relevant or important to the matter at hand. For example, if someone is talking about their favorite food and you start talking about your favorite color, that would be impertinent because it has nothing to do with the topic being discussed. In legal terms, impertinent evidence or allegations are ones that do not help prove or disprove the case and are not important for the court to consider.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A lawfirm's watermark being deemed irrelevant or inconsequential as grounds for dismissal of a complaint seems like a rule that never applies to anybody else.

this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
113 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

17426 readers
198 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS