14
Flattery undermining my confidence
(sopuli.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
14 points (76.9% liked)
Casual Conversation
3334 readers
208 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yes, first off it's really condescending when it's a basic question. Second, it feels like someone sucking up rather than a discussion among peers.
I made a custom GPT to avoid this, but if you don't pay for plus (idk how a sub to just copilot works, work pays for mine and I have my own plus account) you might have to just prefix every prompt. I don't share my custom GPTs because I don't want to be responsible to anyone for maintaining anything, but my full instructions are:
I also detail environment assumptions, but that's just to save me some typing and not really relevant here.
Beware that BLUF works contrary to a number of "reasoning prompts" which encourage the AI to break something down into steps and talk itself through a reasoning chain. Maybe leave that part off and see how it goes. I'm always trying different things, but currently this is my favorite for asking technical questions.
Oh that sounds useful. With chatGPT you can actually just dump that into the settings. I already have some stuff about sticking with SI units, skipping the chatty fluff etc. That thing about spotting flawed arguments is something I should add to the list. Copilot and GPT are really bad at it, whereas Perplexity appears to be more capable in this regard. Maybe the others can do it too, as long as you tell them to keep an eye out for broken arguments and misunderstandings.