705
submitted 1 year ago by mastermind@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

Software. Should be free, isn’t. Blame Bill Gates.

lol...

that's just some dumb take. Some software can and should be free (operating systems, for example) but all software? lol

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You like your free Android kernel? How about your free browser. Or MF'er, do you like this lemmy shit that you're using?!?!?!? What about all the network architecture so you don't have to pay dozens of owners so that you can send a packet of data from your the open-source router software to the Linux server that is hosting your game.

Make no mistake Microsoft has been at war with open source since its business model requires people to pay for software. It would destroy open source if it could, it it probably will after it acquires enough enough market share.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

MF is your choice of term to open discussion with someone on a topic you disagree on? Surely this is going to get your audience to be open to accept your views/input.

Edit: the discussion likely is about your use case of the term free

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Weird way to avoid the Epstein island, charter school proponent, weird bullshit in Africa guy, literally at war with open source guy discussion.

Hey I'm sorry that I made an abbreviation for a naughty word.

I'm assuming uralsolo is talking about free software as in, software which gives users the four freedoms.

I don't think all software needs to be free, but in some ways, it's no longer the issue of the day. In this day and age, a lot of what we're using is no longer really software. We're using services with client-side Javascript which is nominally free software (but not really). Most of the actual software is sitting behind a server. I see this as good and bad. It means users of less popular operating systems get access to the same services as users of popular operating systems so long as they have browsers, and the negatives are, well...I'm sure you don't need my help to think of some.

It's hard to make money with free software because everyone has the right to commercially exploit it. For this reason alone, I don't think it's necessary for all software to be free, but I'll be there to celebrate the programs that are free.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
705 points (96.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43965 readers
1540 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS