1242
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
1242 points (98.1% liked)
People Twitter
7872 readers
293 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
By that logic is fire not hot because what fire touches becomes hot?
No because these are not comparable things. fire is the chemical reaction changing energy into heat, it IS heat to the extreme.
Sooo water is wet to the extreme?
Water is water. Something covered in water can be described as "wet".
And, no, water can't be covered in water. It is just more water.
I like sticking my hand into dry water
Ice?
Also me too yes
It's water all the way down
This seems very... arbitrary.
What if you used food coloring? You could have some red water, and if poured carefully, and before it diffused, you could "cover" it in blue water. Certainly, there'd be no way to get to the red water without first touching the blue bits, which feels a lot like being covered by them.
Food coloring isn't water. I'm talking pure H2O, baby
But it... it can't move unless the water moves. It just visually distinguishes... okay.
But if I put flowing lava on more flowing lava it no longer has the property of being hot it just becomes more lava?