9
Andor v. Star Trek: How Star Wars gets government right [8:50]
(www.youtube.com)
/c/StarTrek: Your safe harbored Spacedock in these Stellar Seas!
Fire up the inertial dampeners, retract all moorings and clear space dock. It's time to boldy go where no one has gone before!
~ 1. Be Civil. This is a Star Trek community and lets keep that energy. Be kind, respectful and polite to one another.
~ 2. Be Courteous. Please use the spoiler tags for any new Trek content that's been released in the past month. Check this page for lemmy formatting) for any posts. Also please keep spoilers out of the titles!
~ 3. Be Considerate. We're spread out across a lot of different instances but don't forget to follow your instances rules and the instance rules for Lemmy.world.
First, when I say "OP", I generally mean the blog or video poster, not the person who posted to Lemmy. I know, it's utterly incorrect, but I don't have a better term. Publisher? Author? Blogger? Vlogger? Anyway, I don't assume the poster made the content, or even necessarily agrees with the content (although, people rarely post things they think are BS), so I apologize. It's a bad habit I'll change when I find better terminology.
Second, as you quoted the vlogger(?), Star Trek paints an unrealistic picture" is an unambiguous statement about their opinion, and which I think warrants my evaluation. Calling a sci fi series about far future politics "unrealistic" is an admission that one doesn't believe politics can change. More so, it exposes that one believed politics has never changed. It says, "what we have now its the only way it can be," which I believe is a good indication of pessimism.
I hope that clarifies and defuses any implied or perceived slight.