104

At donor retreats and in pitch documents seen by The New York Times, liberal strategists are pushing the party’s rich backers to reopen their wallets for a cavalcade of projects to help Democrats, as the cliché now goes, “find the next Joe Rogan.”

[...]

The first out of the gate has been Chorus, a well-publicized liberal nonprofit group co-founded by the Democratic influencer Brian Tyler Cohen.

But others have stayed under wraps until now. In November, Ms. McBride and other liberal operatives gathered in Washington for a series of meetings to survey the election wreckage. At the headquarters of American Bridge, one of the largest Democratic donor networks, they eventually hatched a plan for a for-profit media company called AND Media, which stands for “Achieve Narrative Dominance.”

The company, incorporated in March, says it is aiming to raise $45 million over the next four years. The group hopes to have a $70 million budget over that time frame based on predictions of $25 million in revenue. It says it has raised $7 million so far. Ms. McBride and Christian Tom, who led digital strategy for the Biden White House, have pitched the company to American Bridge donors as a broad cultural project.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 10 points 22 hours ago

It's worth noting, I think, that most of the big right-wing influencers are absolutely artificial and propped up by far-right billionaires.

Yeah, but it's a mix, right? You wait for someone to become mildly successful, to find the right nerves to hit, the right formula to corner an audience, then you prop them up and promote them to help them get bigger. I mean, not all, there's like the Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro types that are fully just mouthpieces, but then you've also got streamers who tapped into something organically. At least, that's my impression, I don't watch them or know anything about them, really.

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Having thought on it a bit, I think both types exist, with the notable difference that the less artificial ones are onboarding younger people accidentally, while the more artificial ones are deliberately trying to onboard older people. Like, how many 30 year olds (who aren't already massive chuds) are going to become fans of Andrew Tate or Asmongold, and conversely, how many 17 year olds are going to start watching Ben Shapiro? How much the different demographics matter is up for debate, but dems are definitely lacking in the group that targets younger people, and probably also need to invest in media that appeals to people who have checked out of the political process because the dems don't fucking do anything even when they win.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
104 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13833 readers
933 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS