221

Link

I think it’s a good statement, short and to the point. The replies are absolute poison though, hasbara bots really honing in on them. Feds will try and make something stick but it doesn’t sound like he was even a member.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 27 points 2 days ago

They could have omitted the do not support part entirely from the statement

[-] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 29 points 2 days ago

They didn't say why they didn't support it. If it was "we do not condemn ANY violence EVER" I'd agree with you. But the PSL does not support adventurism and they didn't explicitly condemn it either.

PSL has nothing to gain by associating with this act, so why risk it at the moment?

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Meh, whatever. For based akzione there is unity of fields (which was nearly shattered over minor actions), and americans are largely passive, so it's not like even direct call to redacted-1redacted-2 from psl would increase anything material, they are not bla with infrastructure to do that sort of stuff (and bla was not that effective due to chosen methods being extremely obvious, but same is true here so besides the point)

[-] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago
[-] plinky@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

black liberation army , of assata shakur fame wiki link

[-] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago

Ehh, their lawyers probably said to put it in for good luck.

this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
221 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13837 readers
772 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS