324
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
324 points (98.8% liked)
Uplifting News
16090 readers
64 users here now
Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.
Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What context?
It's nobody else's choice
Nobody else is gestating the foetus, nobody else will potentially be squeezing it out of their body, to great cost
The toll that pregnancy takes on women is woefully underestimated by almost everyone.
Women lose teeth because the foetus parasitises their calcium to such a great extent
There is no "context" other than being OK with forcing a woman to be an incubator
I stand by my original statement
The only reason a woman needs for an abortion is that she wants one.
It's that simple.
I wasn't arguing with you, you misunderstood my point. I was just adding onto what you said.
My point being: when we start to try to apply moral "code" to something as personal and nuanced as abortion, people always suffer because it's so personal and nuanced.
I am agreeing with you, it should be nobodys decision but the woman, because every woman's situation (CONTEXT) is different, so there's literally no way to apply some kind of blanket morality to abortions.
The reason a woman might want one can change based on so many factors, so trying to dictate that women should only be able to get one when they're needed requires defining situations where they're needed, the thing is, though, if an abortion is wanted, then it is needed.
I am agreeing with you.