112
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
112 points (99.1% liked)
United States | News & Politics
8324 readers
238 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Where in the first amendment does it guarantee funding for state media?
NPR folks can’t seem to make up their minds. Does it need the government funding or not? Because every time this comes up, the NPR defenders diminish the impact by saying only a small fraction of funding comes from the government, but now it’s somehow a showstopper if the funding stops?
The corporation for public broadcasting has been manufacturing consent for made up wars since their inception. I’ve heard them read CIA press releases verbatim on-air without even minimal pushback. And their corporatization for the past few decades has only exasperated the problems, while cutting out any content of value. Fuck’em.
Funding is not guaranteed by the first amendment, but trump retaliating against them because he doesn’t like their content is a violation of free speech and that’s what the lawsuit is alleging. From the article:
“The Order’s objectives could not be clearer: the Order aims to punish NPR for the content of news and other programming the President dislikes and chill the free exercise of First Amendment rights by NPR and individual public radio stations across the country.”
That is an extremely weak legal argument with potentially disastrous precedent being set that no government entity could be defunded for their policies.
NPR is not a government entity and the executive branch punishing the press because the truth hurts the president’s feelings sets a disastrous precedent.
If you think it’s not a government entity, why are you arguing they should receive state funding? Pick a lane.
All right two things here. First of all he doesn't think it's not a government entity, it's not a government entity. That's a statement of fact. Secondly since when does State funding not go to non- government entities? When was that a rule?
Since when is a government obligated to fund an organization that isn't part of that government?
Since the elected Representatives of the legislative Branch authorized it. Like they do for all funding for non-government organizations. Of which there are hundreds. There's some Schoolhouse Rock videos that might explain it better.
Authorization =/= obligation, very simple really
I see so you're under the impression that after legislation has been passed there's no obligation to follow it. You must be really enjoying the current political climate.
Correct, legislation authorizing funding for a thing does not obligate anyone to continue funding that thing in perpetuity, fucking duh. I hate Trump but one of the few silver linings to his presidency is the dismantling of our many propaganda outlets. Fuck NPR, cry about it loser.
There it is.
Fuck this insincere prick.
Lol nothing insincere about it, you're just butthurt because you love US propaganda like a good little patriot. If you want to spread that brainrot so badly you can pay for it yourself.