666
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] admiralpatrick@lemmy.world 164 points 9 months ago
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 119 points 9 months ago

I volunteer as tribute!

HEY CHUMPS! Y'ALL GOT PLAYED BY A CONMAN! MUSK AND TRUMP DON'T GIVE TWO SHITS ABOUT ANY OF YOU! MAYBE THINK ABOUT THAT FOR ANY FUTURE ELECTIONS, HUH?

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 82 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

RICH PEOPLE ARE NOT GENEROUS. IF THEY WERE GENEROUS THEY WOULDN'T BE RICH PEOPLE. THEY ARE THE OPPOSITE OF GENEROUS.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 28 points 9 months ago

Isn't it illegal to pay for voting and to be paid? Or, is it just illegal to pay for votes?

[-] BBQuicktime@thelemmy.club 17 points 9 months ago

Not if you're among the ultra-rich. Supreme Court has decided that rules are for the poors.

[-] admiralpatrick@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I know the former is, but not sure if the recipient is on the hook or not.

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

That's because he didn't say he will pay them for voting. He said he would pay them to sign a petition that supported a certain candidate. I think that's technically not illegal?

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Wasn't there a lottery of a million dollars or something? Pretty sure that was for votes. What I'm hearing is, he won't be charged or prosecuted for anything, legal or not.

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Nah the lottery wasn't actually a lottery because it came out that the winners were already picked. Because apparently you're not allowed to run a lottery whenever you want without asking the government.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/elon-musk-says-1-million-election-giveaway-wasnt-an-illegal-lottery-2025-01-26/

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 months ago

That seems like "a dog ate my homework" kind of answer to that. So a better headline would be:

Elon Musk committed fraud in rigged lottery at illegal vote persuasion event

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

My answer was facetious.

But if he did something illegal and hasn't been prosecuted for it that means it's not illegal?

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

But if he did something illegal and hasn’t been prosecuted for it that means it’s not illegal?

Okay, lmao. That's hilarious.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

That's my understanding as well. "Sleezy but not technically illegal" is pretty on-brand for Musk.

[-] mrbubblesort@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Isn’t it illegal to ...

No one gives a shit anymore

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Isn’t it illegal to …

The average American hasn't yet realized the benefits, or consequences, of our newly instituted unfettered lawlessness.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

My understanding is that it potentially isn't illegal, because you weren't being paid to vote explicitly, and weren't being paid to vote for a specific candidate for sure, but you were (supposed to be) paid to sign an agreement that you would vote, and I think it also said you support a certain candidate but I'm not totally sure on that.

Basically, he was paying for people to say they'd vote (maybe for a certain candidate) but legally that wasn't actually required, so possibly barely skirts the law if a judge is being very generous to him.

[-] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Not if you also pay all the people who would enforce that law

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

I know right? Whatever would have given them the idea that he has ever done anything he's promised? All the failed promises with Tesla? The boring company?

[-] dgdft@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

@admiralpatrick@lemmy.world The spam ban on the OP of this post seems heavyhanded (at least from the outside). Can you review or offer additional context?

E: this seems to (maybe) be the reason for anyone else wondering https://lemmy.world/post/29949200/17158534

[-] admiralpatrick@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I can DM the mod who issued it.

Additional context: https://lemmy.world/comment/17158534

TL;DR is the account has a history of leaving spam-like posts in its wake. Instead of deleting posts, they edit the title and URL to gibberish and leave them up. The comment I linked above is me asking OP to not do that (at least in this community), so they have been warned. Looks like they left two more gibberish posts early this morning which is likely what triggered the other mod to issue the community ban.

Per the comment I linked, I'm assuming that is why OP has been banned from so many other communities.

See:

Edit: Typo

[-] dgdft@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That makes total sense. Tyvm for the transparency <3.

this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
666 points (99.4% liked)

News

35800 readers
1004 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS