665
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Darkard@lemmy.world 250 points 1 week ago
[-] admiralpatrick@lemmy.world 164 points 1 week ago
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 119 points 1 week ago

I volunteer as tribute!

HEY CHUMPS! Y'ALL GOT PLAYED BY A CONMAN! MUSK AND TRUMP DON'T GIVE TWO SHITS ABOUT ANY OF YOU! MAYBE THINK ABOUT THAT FOR ANY FUTURE ELECTIONS, HUH?

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 82 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

RICH PEOPLE ARE NOT GENEROUS. IF THEY WERE GENEROUS THEY WOULDN'T BE RICH PEOPLE. THEY ARE THE OPPOSITE OF GENEROUS.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago

Isn't it illegal to pay for voting and to be paid? Or, is it just illegal to pay for votes?

[-] BBQuicktime@thelemmy.club 17 points 1 week ago

Not if you're among the ultra-rich. Supreme Court has decided that rules are for the poors.

[-] admiralpatrick@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I know the former is, but not sure if the recipient is on the hook or not.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

I know right? Whatever would have given them the idea that he has ever done anything he's promised? All the failed promises with Tesla? The boring company?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] blinfabian@feddit.nl 108 points 1 week ago

100 dollars? yall sold the usa for 100 dollars?

[-] mienshao@lemm.ee 82 points 1 week ago

It’s one democracy, Michael, what could it cost? 100 dollars?

load more comments (1 replies)

And didn't even get the money up front.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yall sold the usa for 100 dollars?

Consider that Trump had something like a 47% approval rating on the day of the election.

Also, yes. People are broke af, hate their neighborhood, hate their country, and hate everyone who has governed it since JFK. If someone offered you $100 for a pile of shit, you'd take the deal, too.

The joke of it all is that they believed a career con-artist would pay out, not that they gleefully pawned the broke down jalopy of a nation-state at the first opportunity.

Do not think for a second that they won't try to do it again.

[-] Zacpod@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

To be fair, I'd hate my life, too, if I lived next to a bunch of MAGA morons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 80 points 1 week ago

Paying people to vote a certain way should be one of the worst crimes in a democracy punishable by the harshest of punishments

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago

In Murica..?!

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The guy whose companies don't pay debts didn't pay debts? Who could have seen this coming?!

Edit: changed from singular to plural.

[-] hansolo@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

The guy's not a Lannister. I mean, he probably would fuck his sister, but still...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 65 points 1 week ago

Yeah no shit.

Paying them would be illegal

Conning them isn’t.

[-] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago

Well, it's still illegal. Just with a considerably smaller penalty

[-] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 week ago
[-] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

It's more like a processing fee :)

[-] j_elgato@leminal.space 56 points 1 week ago

Screwed over by the world's richest man?

Yeah, well so was the rest of the nation...

[-] SSNs4evr@leminal.space 42 points 1 week ago

Musk meant $100 credit, towards the purchase of a cybertruck. 🫤

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago

Or a brand new, top of the line toy Yoda!

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Maybe it was supposed to be 100 doll hairs... common mistake.

[-] EpicMuch@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago

No one has ever become a billionaire by paying people what they’re owed

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

When one of the two biggest black holes for cash on the entire planet promise to make things better for you if you just do this thing they want to happen, you shouldn't be surprised if at the end of the process you have less money and they have more money. Elon Musk is expert at making money move from you to him. So is Jeff Besos. It doesn't have to be direct from you to them via a payment, just know that they are sucking up the money, and if you ever, ever, ever do something they want you to do, you can be 100% sure it's because after they're done, you have less money and they have more.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

That crowd loves grifters and con-men. That Trump crowd acts like peasants just to get close to the proximity of wealth.

[-] ricardoharvin@mstdn.social 26 points 1 week ago

@dwazou can't get prosecuted for buying votes if you never pay

[insert smirks and taps forehead meme]

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

It goes to show how dumb people are

All you have to do is wave some money around in their face and make promises to them

.... and they'll do whatever you ask them to do .... then when all is said and done, you can just walk away and never give anyone anything.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maurice: 'To my right, heh, to everyone's right in fact, we have congressman Alex Shrub; the youngest state congressman to ever be elected by Vice City and now a respected man in the capital. Mr. Shrub got elected because he has great hair and says things that make you nod your head. His campaign appealed to the wealthy because he set all of us at ease by confirming, "It's okay to be rich, as long as you say you care about the children." Mr. Shrub, welcome!'

Alex: 'That's not entirely true, Maurice. My campaign also appealed to the poor... who were too stupid to understand what I'm saying, so I held up pretty pictures and then I gave out candy bars to appeal to their most base insticts.'

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Pnut@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

No. Fucking. Shit.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

It only makes sense that you could buy a presidency in an uber capitalistic country.

[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Sometimes, news is surprising.

This is not one of those times.

[-] WatDabney@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago

So the only question really is whether it's more the case that he's not paying because there's a chance that he could be prosecuted for buying votes or if he's not paying just because he's a lying sack of shit who doesn't keep promises.

Or both.

I'm thinking both.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I am not surprised at all

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

GTFOutta here! Seriously!? I am shocked.

SHOCKED!

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Sold your country to a guy Tesla wants to pay 58b a year to so he can tank it for $100 and he doesn’t pay.

Cool.

[-] alphahowler@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Living by the Christian values of “promise” 😂😂😂

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago
[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Well I am shocked, SHOCKED I say! Well, not that shocked.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Because of course he wouldn't pay up. The man could literally afford to take more money than any one person could ever spend in their life, put it in a pile and set it on fire, and not be any more than a fraction of a percent poorer, but he's still such an unfathomably awful cunt that he just has to stiff people anyway.

[-] Nualkris@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
665 points (99.4% liked)

News

29661 readers
1445 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS