293
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago
[-] Glaedr304@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Can you walk me through why you think this is bad? Doing a quick search for the license didnt make it apparent to me.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.

What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.

Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
293 points (99.7% liked)

Open Source

37638 readers
18 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS