571
submitted 1 year ago by t0fr@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

then spin up your own wireguard instance and connect to it?

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If only it was that easy...

Tried that. And openvpn tun+tap configs, Various ports incl 443, even shadowsocks. None of it gets through.

[-] EmbeddedEntropy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Use Tailscale. Much easier to configure and manage than raw WireGuard.

[-] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

raw wireguard is hard to setup? since when?

[-] EmbeddedEntropy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I’ve done both. I wrote my own scripts to generate the WG config files to handle variations in configure I needed to make for my different networks (masking, IPv6, cross multiple WG networks).

After converting to Tailscale, WG is just an extra level of hassle I can now easily avoid.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
571 points (97.0% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
670 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS