672

submitted 1 month ago by NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 month ago

kinda uncomfortable this ignores concept of consent?

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 month ago

Sex is with consent. If there's no consent it's a rape

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

i agree!

[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

Only if you assume it does.

[-] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

That falls under WRONG. Lack of consent is WRONG but there’s also nothing worse than documentation that is WRONG.

[-] gnutrino@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

Nothing worse than non-consensual documentation.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

aka surveillance capitalism

[-] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

It's not about consent. No one is suggesting rape

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025

672 points (94.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

25139 readers

1402 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS