35
submitted 2 weeks ago by nulluser@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

See… you’re pretty much aggressively agreeing with me and that’s fucking ridiculous, but also clown shit.

In this thread a bunch of people are suggesting that sex workers would/ should take on clients that have a higher than average probability of hurting them… failing to acknowledge the fact that sex workers may or may not take on a particular client.

The overall sentiment behind the comments like that is putting an obligation on to sex workers, “fuck this guy and save the world.”

Sex workers can say, “no” to a potential client just as well as they can say “yes.”

There’s also several places that already have legal sex workers; yet here we are with this problem.

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe sex workers should also keep a gun in a drawer, or better yet hire a bodyguard

A few dead abusive johns will go a long way to cleaning up the scene

this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
35 points (94.9% liked)

science

19421 readers
150 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS