17
submitted 3 days ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/world@quokk.au

As governments and food companies scramble to meet sustainability targets, vague calls to eat some less but “better” meat no longer cut it to keep the planet healthy. To stay within planetary boundaries, we need to drastically reduce meat consumption, especially beef.

But the findings also offer a path beyond all-or-nothing thinking. It’s clear from the study that sustainable diets tend to rely heavily on plants, and the research identified multiple diets that meet health and environmental goals, from pescatarian to flexitarian to vegetarian.

Crucially, combatting climate change by addressing food systems isn’t just about individual choices (though some individual actions like eating less meat and cutting food waste do make a difference!). Personal responsibility alone won’t get us the whole way there. As the study emphasizes, “Achieving truly sustainable diets requires universal availability, which must be supported by policymakers at all levels.” Without clear policies and support from our institutions, consumers are left guessing, and the status quo remains

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

On the other hand, reducing meat consumption by 90% is a LOT easier than reducing car travel by 90% for a lot of people who don't work from home or live near work.

[-] MTK@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That is true, diet change is not easy to start with, but it is doable for the average person and gets easy after a few weeks to months, while excluding fossil fuels from your life is almost completely incompatible with modern countries and in some even impossible (water pumps and electric generators from your local government often uses fossil fuels and it's close to impossible to go that "off the grid")

this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

World News

142 readers
296 users here now

!usa@ponder.cat

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS