35

Why isn't this a popular thing?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

You keep with your naive argument about noon being arbitrary and pretend as if your proposal isn't like climbing up a tree arse first.

I don't have any proposal at all, and until you get that into your head, I just don't see how you can possibly have enough of a basis to even continue this conversation intelligently.

You're just wrong.

Citation needed.

With your system,

I. Don't. Have. A. System.

if you woke up after drinking for days, not knowing literally where on Earth you are, you would see a restaurant, read the sign and still have zero idea when it was open. You'd need to know where you are and "when" the times are. Ridiculous

Bro, other languages exist. If you woke up after drinking for days, it's entirely likely that you won't be able to read the words on the sign and know whether it's a restaurant or a nursing home or a gambling parlor.

It's called the middle of the day, because it's in the middle of the day.

That there's what we call a tautology.

Before it there's an equal amount of light as after it. Youre honestly going to stand here arguing that high-noon being in the middle of a DAY is arbitrary, without smelling a hint of irony?

Nope. But you still aren't actually dealing with the reality that I'm not saying the word "noon" is arbitrary, I'm saying that the numbers we've assigned to it are. Remember, in the twelve hour clock, noon happens at the end of one set of numbers and at the beginning of the other set. In some timekeeping systems it's even weirder. Other choices could and have been made, and are even still in use.

I'm begging you. Give some indication that you are at all literate here.

You're clearly upset and projecting. Is English your first language? It's honestly amazing how often I end up correcting Americans on how to use English.

Not sure what you're talking about. I'm having a great time watching you make a fool of yourself and froth at the mouth about how intelligent you are. It's hilarious.

You didn't understand the point. I was talking about Romans. Happy desperate googling, mr angry-like-a-wet-cat!

Aw, sorry, I already noted that you're angry. You can't "no u" that one back at me. I'm deducting five indignation points.

You saying a thing doesn't make it so. For instance I could say that literally every word you said was arbitrary. It doesn't make it so, does it? Also, trying to use prescriptivism shows just how lacking you are in your linguistics conversational.

...eh? I'm very clearly not being prescriptivist, since I'm the one taking about how the word has been used differently through time.

Are you feeding my posts to ChatGPT and asking for responses?

Me purposefully not replying to each of your childish retorts wouldn't help anything.

Ah, classic. "I don't have an actual argument, so I'll pretend like making one is beneath me and hope the other person makes it for me..."

You're just wrong but you'll never be able to accept it. You'll equivocate, possibly for weeks even.

"...and then I'll preemptively lay the table for me to exit the conversation with righteous indignation when I've used up all of my insults or gotten bored." Love it. Well done.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

to even continue this conversation intelligently.

citation needed

You don't understand what the word "arbitrary" means, lol.

I haven't laughed this hard in weeks.

I. Don't. Have. A. System.

With your imagined system of "if everyone had always lived with random ass times they would feel as normal as they do now".

No, they wouldn't, because unlike your ignorant-ass thinks, they aren't arbitrary. You don't understand the basic history of timekeeping and you have an utterly childish point, which is also wrong. Yes I know you're not directly proposing the use of another system, implications exist. You're just backing up on everything you've said after I rub your face in how stupid it's been, then you pretend you don't have a face full of poo.

It's ridiculous.

I speak 2 languages on a native level, one or two more fluently and a half a dozen in a "I could order in a restaurant" level. I'm pretty sure I know more expressions about time in more languages than you. How many languages do you speak?

it's entirely likely that you won't be able to read the words on the sign

This is why I keep replying. You're hilariously ironic. Remember you insisting how "numbers are inherently meaningless"? Scripts and languages change, sure, but most of the world uses Arabic numerals. :D It doesn't matter if you don't know the local language or "what time local noon is" or even if they're using the same alphabet, you'll still recognise a number like 14:00 - 03:00 and then look up at the sky and it's not yet noon and you'll know you'll have to wait several hours at least.

With as with an actually arbitrary system you might see numbers like 0748-5531 and have no fucking idea if it's even a time or even if it is a time, what time it's referring to, even if you know it's exactly midday.

But you'll not admit that laughable. Which in itself amuses me.

That there's what we call a tautology.

No shit, that's why I'm laughing at you. You're pretending like "noon" means nine because of its etymology, as in you're pretending as if you understand linguistics, when you don't understand that ignoring it's actual descriptive meaning of "mid-day" (which is why it's "high noon, because that's describing the position of the sun) is something even a first year linguist would never do. Hell, even if you had just read the basic wiki entry you'd know how ridiculous that is. But you're not about learning, you're about pretending you know things.

I'm saying that the numbers we've assigned to it are

And I'm saying you are wrong in that. Because you are. You are wrong in saying that. Do you understand? You are incorrect. It is not arbitrary. Even the number 12 isn't arbitrary, neither is 24 or 100. That's not what the word means, sweetums. <3

Not sure what you're talking about

Yes, I'm perfectly aware. Watching you prance around pretending to be smart is like watching toddlers bake mud cakes. It's cute how they think they're doing a credible job and you just have to act along so they can enjoy themselves. :)

..eh? I'm very clearly not being prescriptivis

Honestly you're literally making my sides hurt

Oh I'm not going anywhere, hunny. You're better entertainment than this show I'm watching.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

You don't understand what the word "arbitrary" means, lol.

Well, if you said it, it must be true.

With your imagined system of "if everyone had always lived with random ass times they would feel as normal as they do now".

So wait, is this a pivot, or are you still trying to claim that I'm advocating for this? I have completely lost track of what you're framing your abusive posts on now.

Anyway, your imagined system of "somehow the fact that the time when people wake up is called 0600 is inherent to our biology or orbital dynamics or whatever" is absolutely not more logical than the system that the OP has asked about. It's just as arbitrary (hey, yeah, look, I still know what that means!).

You don't understand the basic history of timekeeping

Once again proving that you haven't read the previous posts I've made. Come on, dude. Simple reading. That's all I'm asking for.

and you have an utterly childish point, which is also wrong.

You have yet to actually prove this. Made lots of assertions, but you're just screaming "nuh-uh! YOU are!" over and over at this point and then spiking the conversational football as if it does anything.

You're just backing up on everything you've said after I rub your face in how stupid it's been, then you pretend you don't have a face full of poo.

Finally discovering what I was actually saying because you actually decided to go back and read it this time doesn't count as "backing up." I've been saying the same thing this whole time.

I speak 2 languages on a native level, one or two more fluently and a half a dozen in a "I could order in a restaurant" level. I'm pretty sure I know more expressions about time in more languages than you. How many languages do you speak?

...congratulations? I'm not sure how that's relevant in any way to anything. If it's really important to you: you're very smart and special. I bet you make your parents proud.

It doesn't matter if you don't know the local language or "what time local noon is" or even if they're using the same alphabet, you'll still recognise a number like 14:00 - 03:00 and then look up at the sky and it's not yet noon and you'll know you'll have to wait several hours at least.

Maybe. Or you'll walk up to the door of a veterinarian and wait around for five hours before you realize that people are bringing animals into the place, not walking out with food. There's also the problem of not knowing whether it's before noon or after noon (so a sign that says they're open for lunch from 1000-1800 would be useless if the sun is in a position where it could easily be 0700 or 1900). Or not being able to see the sun due to clouds or night or being inside. What I'm saying is that there are bigger problems involved in the situation you brought up, which is why I doubt anyone would care to solve the time problem. In this fictional, made-up world where the history of timekeeping went a little bit differently. Which you've somehow decided merits insulting me, despite you not actually having an argument that makes any logical sense. (Or at least not one you're willing to share with the class)

But you'll not admit that laughable. Which in itself amuses me.

I admit it's absolutely laughable! You know what else is absolutely laughable? The idea that the current system makes any more sense! If you're trying to coordinate an event with someone just a few miles away but across a time zone boundary in our current system, you have to go to great pains to sort everything out and make sure nobody arrives an hour early or an hour late. Or, even worse, two hours early (which happened once to a friend of mine when he did the time zone math backwards). Despite being just miles apart, and not being able to see any appreciable visible difference between the sun. That's laughable, too.

"Oh, but we have tools to deal with it" or "oh, but we can figure it out" or "oh, git gud, noob"--and yeah, we're used to it because we grew up with it and our parents grew up with it and our teachers grew up with it for generations and generations. If it had gone the other way, we would've developed different tools to deal with it, different ways of figuring it out, and we would've gotten good at other ways of keeping time. That's literally my entire point.

All of this is laughable. It's all arbitrary (yep, still got it) and hilarious because we made it all up. All models are wrong (including timekeeping). Some are useful.

You're pretending like "noon" means nine because of its etymology, as in you're pretending as if you understand linguistics, when you don't understand that ignoring it's actual descriptive meaning of "mid-day" (which is why it's "high noon, because that's describing the position of the sun) is something even a first year linguist would never do.

Your refusal to read in favor of just assuming what I mean is showing again.

But you're not about learning, you're about pretending you know things.

Aw, buddy. You think you're teaching me anything? If you had anything to teach me, that would be a welcome change. I love learning things. But you seem to be in "dunk mode" and absolutely furious that I keep refusing to let you dunk on me.

And I'm saying you are wrong in that. Because you are. You are wrong in saying that. Do you understand? You are incorrect. It is not arbitrary. Even the number 12 isn't arbitrary, neither is 24 or 100. That's not what the word means, sweetums. <3

You seriously think that assigning 12 to "noon" is inherent, babycakes? You literally believe that there's no other way that we could've matched up numbers to the time of day, pumpkin? Like there's not other ways of keeping time that used different numbers or even words instead of the digits you're familiar with on the clocks you own, honeybunch?

We agreed on 1200 as noon. That's why it works, and that's the only reason it works. If we had decided that noon would be 0000 or 1800 or "the sixth hour" or whatever, you'd be screaming your pretty little head off that I'm ridiculous for suggesting that 1200 makes as much sense as anything else. The decision has historical precedent, but it's scientifically arbitrary (boom, still know that word). The planet doesn't care whether we call it 1200 or d3:12:1h::23 or Xylophone, it'll still rotate to put us under the sun at that time.

Yes, I'm perfectly aware. Watching you prance around pretending to be smart is like watching toddlers bake mud cakes. It's cute how they think they're doing a credible job and you just have to act along so they can enjoy themselves. :)

Having been a parent of a toddler, I can tell you it's definitely nothing like that. For one thing, toddlers baking mud cakes is adorable, and I definitely am not adorable.

Oh I'm not going anywhere, hunny. You're better entertainment than this show I'm watching.

I'm so happy to be of service, sweetie-pie. You have a great day now, 'k?

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's true, because it's true. You saying something is "arbitrary" because you don't understand the reason is very stupid indeed. Really American, I might say.

You talk about non-sequiturs (again like a teenager horny to pretend to be a philosopher who actually doesn't know jack shit), while arguing about age. It's hilarious.

You still don't know what "arbitrary" means. 12, 24, 30, even 100 hour systems are in no way arbitrary.

You don't understand what "implication" means either.

Damn, I could be having this conversation in several other languages, but I presume this is your "best" and all you manage is to whinge about how your mudcakes are actual food and stomp your food and cry on the ground until I pretend to eat one to make you happy.

No you haven't "read a book about timekeeping", you're just a kiddo American feeling mighty stupid that someone is mocking them.

Like I told you, I'll eventually tell you the answers, even though they're pretty damn obvious for people who have actually read books about timekeeping. I mean roflmao why the fuck would you think of such a childish lie? This is why America is ridiculed. Your president being what it is has given you a false sense of how much regulate people can get away with asinine bullshitting.

You brought up language skills, and now try to make it seem like you didn't think it important anyway. Seriously, I can't think of a more childish way of going about that.

Remember how you didn't notice anything about the divisibility of hours? Why are there no systems based on a prime number of hours, huh?

Oh I've read your posts. I'm just gonna keep you publicly shaming yourself so the bots have time to archive your stupidity for the rest of the world before you delete in all in an attack of shame when I finally do educate you

Or not being able to see the sun due to clouds or night or being inside

Surely you're not this fucking stupid. You just can't be.

"Hey is it day or night out?"

"Uh, I can't tell, it's so cloudy"

"Oh no, I'm inside, I have no way of knowing where the sun is, because all our buildings are shipping crates with no windows"

"Oh no, it's night, and all the markers in the sky are clearly visible, what to do now?"

You "read a book about timekeeping" recently.....?

I am not and have not argued you at any point. You are my entertainment. Just like I wouldn't fight a kid, I won't argue you.

You're still grossly misusing "arbitrary". I understand you're linguistically challenged so here:

Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more adjective 1. based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.

this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
35 points (80.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

32467 readers
1127 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS