126
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
126 points (93.8% liked)
Privacy
32177 readers
549 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I wonder, could this problem be solved by adding some 'junk' data to each access request? With that junk data being a unique identifier, so the authorities can setup a sting to catch whoever is selling access
Without legislation forcing it, why would they bother? They already have enough separation from the crimes to avoid legal repercussions, and they get to sell data with the "this will be used for profitable criminal activity" premium baked into the original sale price.
It's like expecting Nestle to take any ~~steroids~~ action (weird auto-correct) to prevent child slavery. Why are they going to stir the pot and screw up the nice thing they have going?
I'm torn, but I think I'd take steroids to prevent child slavery.
Do we have c/ABrandNewSentence
Build it and they will come edit someone already did!
lemmy.world/c/BrandNewSentence
But you know Nestle wouldn't. To them child slavery is like steroids on steroids.
Slight tangent, but autocorrect seems to have gotten terrible the last year or so. My theory: as more and more people are using it, the initial dataset is being diluted by more and more bad typers. Instead of improving the dataset, it's pulling it in so many different directions that it doesn't know which way is up anymore