178
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ddplf@szmer.info 6 points 1 month ago

It does take a lot of space for devs, but personally I find that absolutely irrelevant, because it's your end user's experience that really matters, and - as a dev - you are most likely to have a much better rig and internet connection than your average Joe.

[-] jim3692@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sure, in many cases the dev's computer is powerful enough to handle that.

However:

  • The more the dependencies, the more likely it is to pull-off a supply chain attack. Any of those thousands modules can be compromised and infect either the user or the developer.
  • Not all computers are optimized for working with so many tiny files. Have you ever worked in a company that uses McAfee Antivirus? Even Defender can be a massive performance hit in some cases.
[-] ddplf@szmer.info 2 points 1 month ago

I have to say that I may be a bit ignorant, because I'm mostly engaged in greenfield projects with very tiny devteams and I always keep my dependencies count low as possible

Thank you for pointing this out, that's very valuable to keep in mind

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
178 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

37475 readers
111 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS