493
submitted 1 month ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/workreform@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think that in some domains (for example, software development) one person working 40 hours is significantly more productive than two people working 20 hours each. Coordination adds a lot of overhead. There's also the difficulty of finding a second qualified employee.

But that's all moot anyway. Someone working 4 days is always going to earn less than someone working 5, and I'm pretty sure most Americans would choose to work more and get more money even if they could afford to work only 4. (Especially since positional goods won't become easier to afford.)

[-] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

I have a 7-hour work day and a 5-day work week. I make less than I did at my previous (8.5-hour/5-day) job, but I'm much, much happier. Highly recommend working less if you can swing it.

I do agree that coordination is a PITA. But, 7 hours is doable and it's not like I'd be actually productive for an extra hour a day. My brain goes to mush.

Some of my coworkers work longer days and take every a day off every other week. As long as they work 70 hours a biweek they're good.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Good luck making a bigger project like that (even a small project).

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
493 points (99.6% liked)

Work Reform

13276 readers
147 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS