1424
submitted 1 year ago by Pips@lemmy.film to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

They were abhorrent. You're really playing semantics here, conditions were essentially slave-like just as, say, Cuba under Batista.

Yes it was bad, still not as bad as chattel slavery, but pretty bad, that's why it was completely deserved when they had a revolution. Not sure why you keep bringing up the colonization of siberia like it's relevant to what's going on now though. Comparing the amount of human life lost in that to the conquest of Americas though is just silly- there's no comparison and the same American government is still around since then!

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

This isn't a "did the UK or Russia kill more natives" kind of discussion. This is a "Russia is a colonial empire" kind of discussion.

And yes of course fewer natives died in Siberia, it's fucking cold there there were never many in the first place.

[-] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They have had several government changes since then. The US has the same constitution since it was doing its shit, the one with slavery in it. (they only do it to prisoners now though, don't ask too many questions about why they have the highest prison population in the world)

Calling them a 'colonial empire' especially from the seat of the worlds largest and most brutal historical colonial empires is laughable. (1/3 of Africa has had a monetary policy run out of Paris to this day, I wonder why they're kicking them out)

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
1424 points (98.6% liked)

World News

32323 readers
876 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS