477
Meta not complying with GDPR
(sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
477 points (98.6% liked)
Privacy
31866 readers
354 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Check the email headers. You can spoof a sender address
I know, already done. Looks fine
All good, just wanted to make sure since it wasn't clear
Thank you anyways for the hint
Spoofing a sender while falsifying compliance with SP~~DI~~F and DKIM are another matter entirely.
OP, do you know if your email host performs these checks? (The popular webmail services do)
S/PDIF (Sony/Philips Digital InterFace) is an audio interface, perhaps you meant to refer to SPF (the Sender Policy Framework)?
Ahh yes, you are correct, I got mixed up!
:)
It is a gmail address
Then you are probably fine unless you're a high value target. Gmail checks these, and any such bypass would not be burned on a common target.