i guess sneerclub must just hate understanding things. yes, that must be it. (www.lesswrong.com)

submitted 1 year ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 6 points 1 year ago

If the conventional wisdom is correct, Bayesianism is potentially wrong (it’s not part of the Standard Approach to Life), and certainly useless: why try to learn through probability theory when tradition can tell you everything you need to know much faster?

Oh, you say you're a Bayesian? Name all 46,656 varieties.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023

20 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

983 readers

1 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

self@awful.systems

blakestacey@awful.systems

dgerard@awful.systems