135
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
135 points (98.6% liked)
United States | News & Politics
8285 readers
447 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
They should get a fixed amount per crime solved.
Payment varies on the severity of the crime.
Uh unfortunately that would lead to pinning all unsolved murders on homeless people. It would give a financial incentive for a cop to shoot 1 homeless person and blame the other.
You understand why that will incentivize the wrong things, right?
Put another way: take a gander at Japan’s criminal justice system. You don’t want that.
I don't know much about the legal system in Japan but they have a higher clearance rate than US cops right?
Japan has an insanely high conviction rate. And the cops also don’t bother filing a case unless they’re pretty sure it’s a ~~spam~~ (e: lol) slam dunk
Tokyo Vice, while a drama, actually portrays Japanese police work in a roughly accurate sense. And the whole bit with how the yakuza have their tentacles into EVERYTHING is closer to the truth than many would like to believe.
Hey I've seen a couple movies like this.
I gotta go back to the sea
"Sprinkle some crack on the body and arrest the nearest homeless person, I've got my eye on a new camaro"
Is that how the justice system works in Japan?
Officially? No.
No because they don't even bother with any case that can't be cleared pretty much immediately, even if that means declaring obvious cases of murder as suicides or accidents. In criminal investigations accuracy is the most important metric not speed or even severity of the crime. You could pay based on conviction rates of course, but whether a conviction happens or not is often more about how stupid the criminal or prosecutor is, and would potentially incentivise faking evidence which is already a problem.