91

I saw this post titled "Scratch a anti-harm reductionist and a fascist bleeds" (https://lemmy.world/post/33320759)

I commented that "harm reduction" apparently means sending billions in weapons to israel while they commit genocide and shutting down campus protests speaking out against that genocide. I said that seemed pretty fascist to me.

Within an instant, they downvoted my post and banned me. Guess it's my fault for posting in a circlejerk community, but I'm still scratching my head on how that makes me a tankie. Something tells me this mod would be calling in the tanks to suppress any dissent if they could.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Looks like @PugJesus@lemmy.world has been going on a rampage against people who are critical of Israel lately, PTB for sure.

@goat@sh.itjust.works Might want to kick this mod out of your community since he's poisoning it for others and kicking out people he shouldn't be.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Looks like @PugJesus@lemmy.world has been going on a rampage against people who are critical of Israel lately, PTB for sure.

Lately?

This is the second post in a row here about his actions.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'll investigate later, thanks for the ping. I've since unbanned some of the users, such as @hark@lemmy.world, the others I'm still investigating and some are also spam

I'm fine with people sharing different views, even if they're controversial. Tankies are also allowed to comment in the community, as long as everyone follows the rules and is mutually respectful towards each other, feel free to engage.

By the way if Lemmy-UI doesn't let you remove the mod, use photon or Tesseract to do it.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 9 points 21 hours ago

Wasn't gonna bother until after I saw this, but looks like PJ gave me a ban for clarifying UN reporting on sexual assault.

Didn't think I was posting anything spicy but you never know the crowd.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 21 hours ago

That sounds like .word mods, banning people for proving them wrong.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

The banhammer is a disagree button.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 12 points 20 hours ago

Yea, seems likely

That bucket guy said 'rape of Jews on October 7th was widespread', and the 'widespread' part fucking got to me.

Not that it's a huge difference but I couldn't stand that guy running around citing that UN report that said it found 'reasonable grounds to believe sexual violence occurred', which is a fucking far cry from 'rape was widespread'

But, if I were to be charitable, i could see a mod coming in cold to that conversation just assuming the worst. But im pretty sure it was pug, if the 'sort by mod' function is accurate.

[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

The genociders have produced zero evidence for any rape.
Except their own OC

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 3 points 11 hours ago

If only that actually mattered.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 20 hours ago

It most likely is, check this community. He's banned people for calling him out on unrelated communities .

Pug is mentally unwell and lashes out at people wanting something better in the world.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 3 points 10 hours ago

I've had some heated exchanges with pug in the past but this is the first time I can say for sure he's moderated me, and for something extraordinarily tame.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works -1 points 13 hours ago

The majority of bans in meanwhileongrad are temporary with the exception of trolls and alt accounts

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works -2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

You were banned for using semantic arguments that rapes occurred.

The UN is not a judicial body and cannot unilaterally define criminal offences within sovereign states. The UN can, however, assist and fund independent bodies to investigate, which found reasonable grounds that Hamas raped women during the 7th of October massacres.

You can even watch some footage, testimonies of victims and witnesses, first-responder testimonies, and captured terrorist testimonies about these rapes.

So arguing that the UN wasn't verbatim with what the user, @PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au, said is a bad-faith position to take, it's handwaving away that the rapes occurred and implying that the UN is a judicial body.

Basing the entirety of your argument on 'Well, not ALL of them were raped' is a pretty disgusting stance that handwaves atrocities, which is in violation of the Apologia and Revisionism rule. Your ban was made permanent, and you weren't warned beforehand, which I'm not happy with, so I can unban you within 24 hours if you so desire and if you follow the rules in the future.

I'm also not interested in arguing about the validity of the rapes either because it's not relevant to the thread at hand.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 4 points 11 hours ago

I was addressing someone saying that 'rapes of jewish women were widespread', which to my ears is an unfounded characterization of a report which went to great lengths not to say anything half as definitive. If anyone in that thread was guilty of apologia or revisionism, it sure as fuck wasn't me.

But you're right, this isn't the place to argue about it. Do what you want.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

I'll unban ya since you weren't given a warning

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

@hark@lemmy.world , could you maybe add a "ban reserved" or something in the title?

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Why? The ban was reversed by a different person. Edit to the main post would be more appropriate if anything. His main point stands, PJ is unhinged.

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Hm, good point

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago

Idk, if he didn't kick our pj before why would goat do it now.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Pug and I had a falling out, and he stepped down but retained his moderator role. If you check the modlog you can see he hasn't acted in quite a while until just recently

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 21 hours ago

Why not remove him if he's causing more issues for you?

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago
[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Having an unhinged narcissist as a mod is not ideal for any community.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago

Yeah it's not a good look that Tankie now means "I don't like genocide". Just further dissolves the word's meaning and enables .ml and hexbear to do more things.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yeah it’s not a good look that Tankie now means “I don’t like genocide”.

It's what it's meant on lemmy, particularly .world, for a while now. centrists just use it like (other) republicans use "woke."

It means "this person has an opinion I know I'm morally wrong about. I don't want to change my position but I also don't want to look bad, so I'll pick a term I can't define and use it as a cudgel against them."

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago

I've been called a Tankie for wanting the Democrats to support trans rights to win against Trump.

Means nothing in 2025.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

What things are we malevolent tankies going to do, aside from voicing our opinions in the fediverse? Enforce authoritarian bedtime?

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I wish you would because I'll never get to bed at a reasonable hour otherwise.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

enables .ml and hexbear to do more things.

Making us sound so nefarious, and I'm only a little evil. The word tankie has definitely been getting worn out to the point of being the centrist equivalent of chuds calling people "woke"

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Well when people get banned for being anti-genocide and war as "Tankie" what does it mean?

It means that someone is being allowed to mod who shouldn't be.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

I don't know, I didn't ban anyone for that reason. I've since unbanned the users who were banned for those reasons and have cleared the air with Pug that this is inappropriate moderation.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

Hope he learns this lesson but don't expect him to forgive you or anyone else for it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

That’s a bit reductionist

But only a bit.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
91 points (87.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

749 readers
151 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS