123
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/funny@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago
  1. Because first past the post electoral systems always result in a 2 party system due to defensive voting.

  2. Because Americans didn't listen to George Washington, when during his farewell address he strongly cautioned against "alternate domination" of a 2 party system.

  3. Because Americans are woefully uneducated, dis-interested, and preoccupied.

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

And because now that it's entrenched, the two parties will collude even past the death of the country to keep it that way

[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

This comment from another post here on Lemmy says it all.

I was listening to the 5-4 podcast recently and they repeatedly stressed the point that Trump has lost ≈90% of lower court decisions and won ≈90% of Supreme Court decisions, which is an absurd swing. I’ll try to dig up a source on it though. Still it’s blatantly obvious that the SC has completely abandoned the rule of law and the constitution.

Without rule of law, we're no longer a country.

[-] dylanmorgan@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

There’s some structural reasons (the senate, primarily) that American politics will almost inevitably devolve into two parties.

If I could do one thing to fix American politics it would be to abolish the senate, which gives low population states an insanely unbalanced level of influence over national politics.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago

It drives me ls me crazy that Alaska gets the same amount of senate votes as California when we’re fifty times their population.

[-] dylanmorgan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Wyoming too, which has even fewer people than Alaska.

[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

(the senate, primarily)

Fair point! In Canada our senate is appointed by the Prime Minister and the position is lifetime. They rarely reject bills from the lower house.

[-] dylanmorgan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Wow, I didn’t realize there even was a Canadian senate, I only ever hear about parliament and figured it was all MPs.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Because first past the post electoral systems always result in a 2 party system due to defensive voting.

Nope. FPTP is the norm worldwide and two party systems very much the exception. Even in the US, it's only been the last third or so of the country's history that two have managed to become so all-conquering in spite of being so unrepresentative.

George Washington, when during his farewell address he strongly cautioned against "alternate domination" of a 2 party system.

Pretty sure he was very much against the concept of political parties in general, rather than having any preference as to how many.

But yeah, the two major parties HAVE pretty much embodied all his worries and more..

Because Americans are woefully uneducated, dis-interested, and preoccupied.

That's a big part of the problem, sure, but the issues of regulatory capture and the two parties themselves being in charge of how the entire system works (including the barriers to entry for everyone else) is MUCH more critical.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
123 points (98.4% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7694 readers
362 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS