1153
Lazy moochers (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 week ago by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This whole "no good landlords" reeks of the same mentality as "no good lawyers."

Not the same at all, as lawyers do work to get paid.

Landlords rent-seek by charging access to important and scarce property that they themselves don't use. They extract value through ownership alone, and add no labor value of their own to the process, that the tenants as owners couldn't do for themselves.

If somebody wants a temporary living situation by themselves or with one partner, what is wrong with them renting an apartment from me?

What gives you the right to these people's paychecks? If you're not using it, then sell it, and don't rent-seek.

There is nothing defensible about being a landlord. Its not exactly the same as owning slaves or owning capital, but all three are based on absentee ownership and extracting value from working people.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml -5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They extract value through ownership alone, and add no labor value of their own to the process, that the tenants as owners couldn’t do for themselves.

What about landlords that do repairs themselves though? Is that not by definition labor or am I missing something here?

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

The tenants can do upkeep themselves, or pay people to do that. Rent-seeking can still exist even if the rent-seekers promise to do maintenance (which in reality they don't have much interest in doing, especially if it doesn't add value to the property). Tenants often have to live for months with broken ACs, appliances, because their landlords have no desire to upkeep temporary items. The yearly lease is signed, and they're getting their money.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

My first landlord sucked, my second landlord was ok, but I suspect most wouldn't be. They repaired everything in a timely fashion, and waived my rent for three months when I got laid off to let me get back on my feet. Still only made sense because I was in college and wasn't sticking around that area long enough to justify buying then selling a property, but for the context acceptable landlords can exist.

[-] Flagstaff@programming.dev -4 points 6 days ago

add no labor value of their own to the process

Huh? Do you think it's not labor when they fix broken doors, outlets, change locks, upgrade toilets, fridges, etc.? Some landlords even do it themselves without hiring subcontractors.

[-] tankfox@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Landlords rent-seek by charging access to important and scarce property that they themselves are responsible for maintaining.

Fixed that for you. You have this attitude like housing is something that grows out of the ground and landlords just happened to find it while on a walk and put a circle around it.

What gives you the right to these people’s paychecks?

Nobody takes you people seriously because of this incredibly entitled attitude. Nobody who has ever had to maintain a property through their own sweat cares to adopt this attitude, any more than the people for your strawman would donate their labor to the company they work for in exchange for no paycheck at all.

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
1153 points (98.2% liked)

Memes

51785 readers
1328 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS