123
submitted 5 days ago by qyron@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Watching a documentary, there was aremark from the journalist on how, due to how wildly taxation on goods may vary, from area to area, in the US, most retailers do not put the full prices on the shelves and instead just tally it at checkout.

This made no sense to me, a european, as when I go to any regular shop, prices already include all taxes applicable to the product.

There are specialty stores where VAT and other taxes may not be applied on the price on the shelf but those are usually wholesellers, selling for professionals, that already know what additional taxes will be added and at which rates, at checkout.

Not having the full price you'll be paying, on display, seems very underhanded and a bad practice. The client should know how much they are going to pay from the moment they pick an item.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 0xtero@beehaw.org 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Why do consumers accept a system like this? Wouldn’t it be just better for consumers if the shop pricetag represented the exact amount you have to pay at the counter?

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

Sure, sounds nice. But is it bad enough that people feel compelled to create a ballot measure and get it changed? Apparently not.

[-] 0xtero@beehaw.org 5 points 5 days ago

Yeah apparently so. I guess it’s not the top of mind problem Americans have right now.

Over here various pro-consumer watchdog organisations would protest wildly and the merchant would most likely get fined for false advertising. So the whole thing feels a bit alien to me.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

I guess it’s not the top of mind problem Americans have right now.

You've got that right!

[-] locuester@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 days ago

Sure if we started the whole tax thing today we may do it different. But it’s culture created over time. Our sales taxes all started during and shortly after the Great Depression in the 1920s. I’m sure store owners likely preferred people realize what they were charging vs the govts take. This is why I like it now. It’s very clear what the govt is taking and what the store is charging. It doesn’t bug me at all to have it added on at the register. It’s all I’ve known for 40 years. Currently I even live in a state with no sales tax (recently moved here), but I’m in a small tourist town that implemented a “resort sales tax” of 1% to help pay for city services related to tourism.

[-] 0xtero@beehaw.org 3 points 5 days ago

I think there's also a fundamental cultural difference in that "govts take". We don't normally see taxes as "taking" in that sense, but I fully understand where you're coming from - it makes sense and seems to work for you guys.

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
123 points (99.2% liked)

Asklemmy

49728 readers
233 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS