79

Bluesky had some controversy when it first came out. Now that it's been around for a while, I'm curious what the consensus is. How does it compare to Mastodon? Is Bluesky now self-hostable and compatible with the Fediverse?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's fine right now still, but given it's a centralized, corporate-run platform at the end of the day, I'm skeptical of its long-term prospects; what's stopping the guys in charge of that platform from going turncoat and turning it fully into Twitter 2.0?

Mastodon by contrast of being an open, decentralized platform, has some immunity against the enshittification that will inevitably ruin any centralized platform.

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

It is Twitter 2.0 The question his will he sell it out like Twitter 1.0 ?

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

You mean when. When is the question.

[-] geolaw@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I always assumed that was the plan. "We sold twitter for so much $! Let's do that again!"

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
79 points (95.4% liked)

Open Source

39475 readers
535 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS