314

Billboards featuring OnlyFans model ruled ‘not overtly sexual’ by UK advertising watchdog (www.euronews.com)

submitted 2 years ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/1891139

Archived version: https://archive.ph/OvFse
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230825144949/https://www.euronews.com/culture/2023/08/23/billboards-featuring-onlyfans-model-ruled-not-overtly-sexual-by-uk-advertising-watchdog

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] NanoooK@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago

What's the good reason to ban a book? Because it makes you think?

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 years ago

What's the good reason to ban a book?

There aren't any.

Because it makes you think?

Christ, no. "Making you think" is kinda the whole reason books exist, so I don't know why you would think that?

[-] CosmoKramer@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Probably because your previous comment said that books are banned "for good reason"

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It also said "public libraries" which the comment I replied to (intentionally) omitted.

It's a bad faith argument. They want to intentionally conflate removing books from children's libraries with banning them from the country altogether.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023

314 points (96.4% liked)

World News

33428 readers

564 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

jackmarxist@lemmy.ml

zephyreks@lemmy.ml

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml