184
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
184 points (83.8% liked)
Privacy
40812 readers
1624 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Their software is open source and you can verify it yourself.
You can't verify that they actually run that on their servers.
So, they operate a repo of open source code as a cover for their internal repo of completely different code?
That is not entirely impossible. Owner spent time in US lobbying, and tech folks that do that are often horrible, careless, and unethical people.
I'm not saying they do that. But you have to trust them that they don't do it. You can never proof it.
Are there any non-self-hosted services where that's not the case?
No. That's why I wouldn't trust protections that depend on something serverside, like encryption in the web client.
No. It's an inherit compromice you have to deal with. At least with email hosting. There are services where you can proof that no one was listening in but with email thats not possible.
At least it is not Google shit, if nothing else.